I believe in the virgin birth, but how do I explain this to my coworkers who don’t believe in Christ or the bible
There is no simple answer to this. Like all things Christian, the unbeliever has a difficult time understanding any revealed truth — on an intellectual level, on an emotionally level, on a personal level. I don’t mean that statement as an insult to anyone’s intelligence. It is rather, an acknowledgment that all of humanity has a disadvantage in understanding anything about deity. We often forget just how much sin has polluted everything in creation…including our minds and the ability to accurately perceive the universe.
Again, there is no statement that we shouldn’t use the abilities and curiosity given by God to approach his creation for understanding. It’s just a warning that we need to do so with a humility of spirit.
Now, explaining to anyone — even another believer — a difficult concept such as the virgin birth requires that we be deliberative. We start with the simple statement of orthodox Christian belief. Jesus Christ is fully God and fully man in one person.
It is common that those who do not accept the truthfulness of Scripture tend to deny the idea of the virgin birth of Christ. Having acknowledged this, if we do affirm a belief in the God revealed in the Bible, sucha miracle is not at all too hard form him. He spoke all that exists into the universe — everything and everyone. Any who would affirm that the virgin birth is “impossible” is just confessing his or her own unbelief in the God of the Bible.
But this truth is doctrinally important, and if we’re to understand the person of Jesus Christ correctly, it is important that we begin with an affirmation of this doctrine.
I think that there are at least three areas where we see the importance of this Christian teaching.
- It demonstrates that our salvation must ultimately come from God himself. There is nothing that we can do to rescue ourselves from drowning in the sea of sin. God had promised that he would destroy the ancient serpent and the results of man’s rebellion through the “seed” of a woman (Genesis 3:15). God did this by his own power, without the assistance of any human effort. Our salvation comes about through the supernatural work of God who “sent his Son, born of a woman, born under law, to redeem those under law, that we might receive the full rights of sons (Galatians 4:4-5).
- The virgin birth made it possible — if difficult to fully grasp — the uniting of full deity and full humanity in one person. Could he have made his Son, a true son of Adam in some other way? Perhaps! But in his wisdom this course of action was decided upon with an end in mind that we might be better able to understand how Jesus could be both God and man. Had he clothed Jesus with humanity without any human parent, we might have difficulty discerning how Jesus was fully human. Had Jesus been born of both a human father and a human mother we would have difficulty understanding in what way he was fully divine. God ordained a combination of human and divine influence in the birth of Jesus.
- This teaching also makes possible Jesus’ true humanity without a corrupt moral nature as all other descendants of Adam have inherited. This is sometimes called “original sin.” Jesus did not descend in exactly the same way as every other human who had ever lived. The legal guilt and moral corruption that infects the rest of mankind does not belong to Jesus.
Can you be a Christian and still believe in evolution?
The short answer is: “yes.” Within the broad category of Christianity, and founded in Christian philosophy, there is plenty of room for people with different opinions about all sorts of peripheral issues.
It could easily be argued that the Bible is not, never was intended, and ought not ever be considered a science textbook. That does not, however, mean that the scripture does not address issues that are factual and of a scientific nature.
A deeper question might be asked why someone would want to believe in evolution. Purporting to be a scientific theory, it does not lend itself well to the scientific method. I’m not trying to be “clever” or be a smart-aleck. If by evolution, you are talking about transformations on a macro level from one species to a completely different species, there ought to be plenty of evidence in the form of transitional fossils — as was expected by the first proponents of the theory. Such evidence has never been found. Therefore, the theory itself ought to be suspect.
When compelling evidence is put forward, simply explained, and easily understood, I’ll be far more likely to entertain the idea and the questions that arise from an evolutionary world view than I am at present. Evolution seems to me to be simply a religious world view that is lacking in credentials and is thus poverty-stricken in the marketplace of ideas.
I read somewhere that Rob Bell defined a virgin to simply mean a young woman. So does this mean that Mary was just young when she had Jesus, or was she actually a virgin in the typical sense of the term?
Yes, there is something to the observation that the word used by the prophet Isaiah could be understood simply to mean a “young woman.” The term used there is the Hebrew word ‘almâ. His argument is that another word, betûlâ, would have been used if the idea of virginity were intended. However, this is not necessarily so.
The latest and most detailed linguistic studies show betûlâ could also refer to a widow or divorced woman who was not a virgin in the sense that we understand the term. ‘Almâ is never used in such a way. Of the nine occurrences of this word, eight clearly are intended to convey the idea of virginity. The other time it is used, there is some question as to the figurative sense in which the author intended it. We may safely say that in the OT ‘almâ is never clearly and unequivocally used to refer to a non-virgin. If any notion of virginity were intended by the prophet—even as only an “implication” — ‘almâ was the best/only word to do that job.
Additionally, the term used by the New Testament gospel writers is a Greek word. This word is parthénoi and is exclusively used to refer to woman in the sense that she is unmarried, carrying with it the connotation that the woman in question is indeed a “virgin” with our understanding of that idea. In Luke’s account, the birth of Jesus plainly differs from that of John the Baptist, though his conception too was “miraculous.” Mary became pregnant with God’s Son through the creative act of God himself. This is the context in which the word is used.
When I pray, I ask for the Holy Spirit to overcome me and for Jesus to make a path from my message to go to God without even recognizing when I do…but why are all these steps necessary when worship goes to one omnipotent God, our Father?
The response to the following question may help by clearly stating the Christian teaching as regards the Trinity even if it doesn’t help us to understand it wholly.
To answer this question we’ve got to back up a bit. God is one. There is one God. He has revealed himself in the scriptures and when he was asked for the name by which he would be known he gave Moses a Hebrew construction known as the tetragrammaton (four consonants) which are rendered YHWH in the Latin alphabet and spelled out as Yahweh. This is difficult to grasp and I’ll give a further explanation at some later date but for now lets keep going.
Was that a digression? Yes! But the point of it is that God is one. He reveals himself further throughout scripture as three persons: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
In the many passages that teach us about prayer there seems to be a pattern. I don’t know that following any particular model is essential for communion with God in an authentic manner. However, the pattern seems to be that we are to put our requests to the Father, in the power of the Holy Spirit, according to the authority of the Son.
This is no magical incantation or requirement of linguistic skill for God to hear your prayers. A sincere and contrite heart is what gives us a hearing as regards our acknowledgment of sin. A sense of wonder and awe at the beauty of his holiness allows us access to the throne room in praise. In humility we bring thanksgiving before him. You see, it is the attitude of our heart in prayer rather than the position of our body or the form of our words.
I accept the Holy Trinity. I just want to be able to respect it more…thanks.
God’s plan from the beginning was to create beings who are worthy of joining him in godlikeness and with whom he would share his glory. To this end he “created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.”
There is much to be grappled with, studied over, and learned about in regards to the Trinity. I would encourage you in this pursuit quite frankly because it is a sorely neglected topic in our age.
I would suggest perhaps that you consider the following:
- As Father, he is producing a family of children who will bring honor to him by being like him, reigning with him, and receiving from him an inheritance of glory.
- As Son, he is pursuing a Bride, resplendent in glory who will bring beauty and honor to him by reigning at his side and with whom he will share his kingdom.
- As Spirit, he is building a temple as a fit dwelling place for his glory that will bring the honor of creation to worship before his throne and to marvel at what he has done.
For your consideration as well I’ve included a section of an ancient creed that the church has used to clarify what is being spoken of when we talk about the Trinity.
Athanasian Creed
We worship one God in the Trinity and the Trinity in unity.
Neither confounding the Persons, nor dividing the substance.
For there is one person of the Father, another of the Son, another of the Holy Spirit. But the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit have one divinity, equal glory, and coeternal majesty.
What the Father is, the Son is, and the Holy Spirit is.
The Father is uncreated, the Son is uncreated, and the Holy Spirit is uncreated.
The Father is boundless, the Son is boundless, and the Holy Spirit is boundless.
The Father is eternal, the Son is eternal, and the Holy Spirit is eternal.
Nevertheless, there are not three eternal beings, but one eternal being.
So there are not three uncreated beings, nor three boundless beings, but one uncreated being and one boundless being.
Likewise, the Father is omnipotent, the Son is omnipotent, the Holy Spirit is omnipotent. Yet there are not three omnipotent beings, but one omnipotent being.
Thus the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God. However, there are not three gods, but one God.
The Father is Lord, the Son is Lord, and the Holy Spirit is Lord. However, there as not three lords, but one Lord.
For as we are obliged by Christian truth to acknowledge every Person singly to be God and Lord, so too are we forbidden by the Christian faith to say that there are three Gods or Lords.
The Father was not made, nor created, nor generated by anyone.
The Son is not made, nor created, but begotten by the Father alone.
The Holy Spirit is not made, nor created, nor generated, but proceeds from the Father and the Son.
There is, then, one Father, not three Fathers; one Son, not three sons; one Holy Spirit, not three holy spirits.
In this Trinity, there is nothing before or after, nothing greater or less. The entire three Persons are coeternal and coequal with one another.
So that in all things, as it has been said above, the Unity is to be worshipped in Trinity and the Trinity in Unity.